![bart widget html bart widget html](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_3fAxhPRDRu8/S7SA20Xd9mI/AAAAAAAAABQ/ycIUT6JYe68/s1600/BS_42_Truman_DCP_001.jpg)
Bootstrap is one of the most famous UI framework, and it’s supported by Twitter. It’s a pure cosmetic thing, and it could be used along with either traditional website or SPA. The buttons, rows and combo boxes would look more **like **native devices. There are some mobile UI frameworks outside that could make your website looks more like mobile devices. Strictly speaking, this is not another approach, it’s just another technique you could add on. There are a lot of related comparison articles in Google. This article won’t go into much details about the framework comparison, but my gut feeling is Vue.js might be a good one to stick with simply because the syntax of this framework looks more explicit and simpler ( Zen of python #2 & #3). There are a number of SPA frameworks outside, here are the most famous ones: One famous example of SPA is the Gmail, whenever you click links in the page, the page is not reloaded, you are just fetched with the new content. The website URL basically would not change except the hashtag (#) part. The biggest difference is that, the web page will not be refreshed during the entire navigation. It’s still a website actually, however it uses some new technologies and frameworks, which are complicated enough to have it separated from the traditional website.
#Bart widget html code#
So the web site may look differently on a desktop and a mobile device, though the underlying HTML source code is not changed. It allows different sets of CSS to be applied to the content, when a different screen size is detected. Responsive: If the site is meant to be seen for both desktop and mobile users, you could use CSS media queries. Technically speaking, it’s not a technology, just a minimum requirement for a page to be shown in a sensible way. For example, you may show a list of items instead of a very wide table in the UI.
#Bart widget html Pc#
Traditional Website:Īdapt to screen: Since the mobile device normally has much smaller screen size than PC and notebook, the mobile website needs to be designed in a way that the layout makes more sense to the user. There are a number of ways to make the web site look better in the mobile device, however. But not many people would actually do that, unless your site is exceptionally attractive or they have no choices (e.g. People may put the website as a homepage icon in the device, if they want. While it’s (very) unlikely to ask the user to type a long address in the mobile browser, you could provide some links in the email or ask the user to scan a QR code to access the URL. The user needs to be open a browser in order to view your content. When using this technology, you basically build a regular website, using HTML + CSS + JS + backend language (Java. (It does not include ALL available technologies since there are too many of them, I just list out the most popular ones).
![bart widget html bart widget html](https://horrorvr.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/screen-shot-2019-05-22-at-14.32.05.png)
Under each category, there are actually a bunch of technologies that could be used with, this diagram briefly illustrate the general picture. Here we make a more detailed classification for those approaches nowadays, in the increasing order of ‘nativeness’: Hybrid: You write some HTML, but (somehow) it appears as native/half-native app in the device. HTML5: You basically just build a website, the user need to start a browser to view your content.
#Bart widget html android#
Native: You build the iOS app using Xcode, and android app from Android Studio. We have a lot of different choices now, in fact, we have too many choices.Īccording to the most popular way of classification, there are 3 main approaches when building the mobile app: Unfortunately, that’s not the case today. If we have no other choices, then we would simply build one iOS app and build one android app, without thinking too much. Say, your own a small team of capable programmers, and you need to build an an mobile app across two platforms (iOS and Android), what would be your best bet?Ĭurrently, there are a lot of different ways to do that, and that’s exactly the biggest problem to many people. Mobile Apps - Native, Hybrid, and HTML5 - A More Comprehensive Review Jan 11, 2017